It’s pretty darn awesome, even if I do say so myself!  It handles the screen touch events directly so it’s just as fast as running a native application on the iPad or iPhone. It also works on other devices.

Samurai 8X puzzle

When I was making Sudoku Xtra 10 I wanted to put in a really big Samurai Sudoku puzzle. In the end because I had a square page area available beneath the instructions I went with a 13-grid one (just as a one-off to see what sort of reaction it got!) but I had started off intending to use an 8-grid one. It seemed a shame to let it go to waste, so I’m posting it here.

• Place 1 to 9 into each row, column, main diagonal and 3×3 box of each of the eight 9×9 grids.
• Note that, as in a regular Sudoku, only the rows, columns and main diagonals within the eight underlying 9×9 grids are guaranteed to contain all of 1-9. Any row, column or diagonal not entirely within a single 9×9 grid has no restriction on its content.

So best of luck – you don’t need it, but it might help anyway!

Samurai Star XXXXX puzzle

I haven’t posted a puzzle for a week (it’s been a busy week, mind!) so it’s time to make up for that, just in time for the weekend.

In this puzzle the aim is pretty simple: place 1 to 9 in each set of 9 squares starting and ending with a bold line, whether in a row or column, and similarly for each set of 9 squares starting and ending with a bold line in any of the shaded diagonals.

Good luck!

I picked 64 Killer Sudoku-X puzzles (52 for the daily puzzlemix section plus 12 for the weekly puzzlemix section), and of those about 5 or 6 (I didn’t write it down…) could be solved via reasonable logical deduction without using the ‘X’ diagonals.  So that’s roughly 10% of puzzles, if picked at random, that don’t need it.  Quite a bit worse than regular Sudoku-X (see previous post), but nowhere near as high a percentage as I’d expected – I had thought it could be 50% or more, although I should say that this isn’t actually a fair comparison because I disabled the cleverest maths-solving techniques from my analysis software. So in fact this is comparing clever Sudoku-X solving against the same Sudoku-X solving with the addition of relatively less clever Killer Sudoku-X solving, so perhaps this biased the result much more to the non-Killer result (from yesterday) than it should have done.  But anyway, I’m not writing a scientific paper and it’s good enough for me!

Killer Sudoku-X puzzleSo the result of all this is pretty simple: the Killer Sudoku-X on PuzzleMix for the coming year should be better than ever!  You should need that X every time…

PS Enjoy the Killer Sudoku-X I’ve attached here! Just place 1 to 9 in each row, column, 3×3 box and main diagonal, plus make sure the cages add to the given amounts – and don’t repeat a number in a cage.

Obviously a regular Sudoku has 9 rows, 9 columns and 9 boxes. Are we annoyed if we don’t “need” all 27 regions? Probably not. But in an ‘X’ puzzle I suppose it’s understandable that you’d expect to use the ‘X’.

Now of course there are different definitions of “needing” a region. Strictly-speaking, if you can prove a unique solution via any method (e.g. recursive search) without the regions then you don’t need them. But I decided to define “need” as meaning “you can’t solve the puzzle without them whilst using the standard solving techniques”. Standard techniques are those that Nikoli allow, so everything up to x-wings and hidden/naked quads.

Using this definition I looked at 100 randomly-selected Sudoku X puzzles of mine and found that 98 “needed” the diagonals, and only 2 didn’t.  Not bad! Of course this result will vary depending upon how vigorously you prune the number of ‘given’ digits in a puzzle.

It’s worth noting that not “needing” a region does not preclude it being useful – for example an easy Sudoku-X puzzle may happen to also be a very difficult regular Sudoku, so there is still value in including the regions even if they aren’t strictly-speaking essential. However there are enough Sudoku puzzle possibilities in the world that we can ignore this and simply select puzzles that don’t have any ambiguities.

Sudoku-X puzzle

So to celebrate, here’s a Sudoku X to solve. Just place 1-9 in each row, column, 3×3 box and the two main diagonals… but you know that already!

Next time I will look at Killer Sudoku X, but with the much heavier constraint of all the extra Killer regions I imagine the X will be needed far less of the time, thus the PuzzleMix comments. So I will be filtering my puzzles in future to make sure the X is always needed! I’ll also be filtering them for extra regions puzzles to make sure those are essential to solving them too.

Mind you, at the end of the day some people always find some puzzles easier than average just by making a fortuitous error – I’m sure we’ve all done it without realising! At those times there will always be puzzles that don’t seem to “need” the X…