<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Just a couple of Calcudoku</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.garethmoore.co.uk/2009/11/just-a-couple-of-calcudoku/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.garethmoore.co.uk/2009/11/just-a-couple-of-calcudoku/</link>
	<description>Puzzle and brain-training author</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2013 11:39:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://www.garethmoore.co.uk/2009/11/just-a-couple-of-calcudoku/comment-page-1/#comment-652</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garethmoore.co.uk/?p=660#comment-652</guid>
		<description>Nice to see the puzzles coming again!  It sounds from your posts as though you have an awful lot on the horizon at the moment.

I also completed these two puzzles very quickly. I really enjoy the Kenken/CalucuDoku puzzles but like Spittledung find most of the published puzzles too easy. I am by no means a puzzle expert (my brain will only take me so far!!) but when I do a puzzle I do like a bit of a challenge and for that reason would not buy the Dell magazines.  There&#039;s an invitation to produce a harder CalcuDoku for us!!

As regards symmetry, as an enthusiast rather than an expert, it&#039;s not something I really take notice of.  Sorry!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to see the puzzles coming again!  It sounds from your posts as though you have an awful lot on the horizon at the moment.</p>
<p>I also completed these two puzzles very quickly. I really enjoy the Kenken/CalucuDoku puzzles but like Spittledung find most of the published puzzles too easy. I am by no means a puzzle expert (my brain will only take me so far!!) but when I do a puzzle I do like a bit of a challenge and for that reason would not buy the Dell magazines.  There&#8217;s an invitation to produce a harder CalcuDoku for us!!</p>
<p>As regards symmetry, as an enthusiast rather than an expert, it&#8217;s not something I really take notice of.  Sorry!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.garethmoore.co.uk/2009/11/just-a-couple-of-calcudoku/comment-page-1/#comment-647</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garethmoore.co.uk/?p=660#comment-647</guid>
		<description>I have been pretty shocked by how (as you say) truly EASY the KenKen/CalcuDoku puzzles published elsewhere generally are! Indeed most can be solved without ever having to think about how the possible solutions in different regions combine and interact together - just a straightforward Sudoku-esque solve suffices, with the ability to do maths needed only to narrow down the candidates satisfactorily.

I also can&#039;t spot the difference between Dell&#039;s Easy Ken-Ken and their regular Ken-Ken magazine - they are both easy, and I think it is perhaps a marketing test? However that is just a guess!

I can make MUCH harder CalcuDoku if you like! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been pretty shocked by how (as you say) truly EASY the KenKen/CalcuDoku puzzles published elsewhere generally are! Indeed most can be solved without ever having to think about how the possible solutions in different regions combine and interact together &#8211; just a straightforward Sudoku-esque solve suffices, with the ability to do maths needed only to narrow down the candidates satisfactorily.</p>
<p>I also can&#8217;t spot the difference between Dell&#8217;s Easy Ken-Ken and their regular Ken-Ken magazine &#8211; they are both easy, and I think it is perhaps a marketing test? However that is just a guess!</p>
<p>I can make MUCH harder CalcuDoku if you like! <img src='http://www.garethmoore.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spittledung</title>
		<link>http://www.garethmoore.co.uk/2009/11/just-a-couple-of-calcudoku/comment-page-1/#comment-646</link>
		<dc:creator>Spittledung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garethmoore.co.uk/?p=660#comment-646</guid>
		<description>Very easy CalcuDoku for me. I did each one in about 2-3 minutes at a guess. I do like that you have dismissed the &quot;subtraction and division can only be 2 boxes&quot; rule that most other puzzles use.

I am finding most of the KenKen type puzzles out there are easy at best.  The local paper has started including 6x6 KenKen and I usually solve those in 5 minutes or less.  I saw a Dell book recently: &quot;EASY KenKen&quot; ... Really?! ... 1+2=3 ... 1*5=5 ... can I go play on the swing set now? :D

I think there is potential for this type of puzzle, but I feel as if it is being dumbed down. Thank you Gareth for working at making CalcuDokus interesting.

I have recently done a book by Conceptis puzzles called MathDoku. Their 5-star hard puzzles were very interesting ... with cages such as 17280x-in-8 and 19+-in-8 (also in funky shapes).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very easy CalcuDoku for me. I did each one in about 2-3 minutes at a guess. I do like that you have dismissed the &#8220;subtraction and division can only be 2 boxes&#8221; rule that most other puzzles use.</p>
<p>I am finding most of the KenKen type puzzles out there are easy at best.  The local paper has started including 6&#215;6 KenKen and I usually solve those in 5 minutes or less.  I saw a Dell book recently: &#8220;EASY KenKen&#8221; &#8230; Really?! &#8230; 1+2=3 &#8230; 1*5=5 &#8230; can I go play on the swing set now? <img src='http://www.garethmoore.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I think there is potential for this type of puzzle, but I feel as if it is being dumbed down. Thank you Gareth for working at making CalcuDokus interesting.</p>
<p>I have recently done a book by Conceptis puzzles called MathDoku. Their 5-star hard puzzles were very interesting &#8230; with cages such as 17280x-in-8 and 19+-in-8 (also in funky shapes).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
