<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jigsaw Gap Samurai</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.garethmoore.co.uk/2009/04/jigsaw-gap-samurai/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.garethmoore.co.uk/2009/04/jigsaw-gap-samurai/</link>
	<description>Puzzle and brain-training author</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2013 11:39:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Spittledung</title>
		<link>http://www.garethmoore.co.uk/2009/04/jigsaw-gap-samurai/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Spittledung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 05:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garethmoore.co.uk/?p=155#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Interesting idea. Figuring out regions was difficult at first as you mentioned. I also stumbled upon what Andrew said above and felt like I was cheating. Then I saw the pattern more and used it to finish the puzzle faster.

I don&#039;t feel I enjoyed it any more than the other sudoku types. It really breaks the KISS principle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting idea. Figuring out regions was difficult at first as you mentioned. I also stumbled upon what Andrew said above and felt like I was cheating. Then I saw the pattern more and used it to finish the puzzle faster.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t feel I enjoyed it any more than the other sudoku types. It really breaks the KISS principle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://www.garethmoore.co.uk/2009/04/jigsaw-gap-samurai/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 08:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garethmoore.co.uk/?p=155#comment-12</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never actually done any skyscraper puzzles so doubt I will meet the 15 minute challenge on this one, but will certainly enjoy having a go at tackling it!  It&#039;s strange how some variations of the japanese puzzles come more easily than others.  It&#039;s really great to see some more adventurous puzzles though, so thanks for keeping the brain cells ticking over!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never actually done any skyscraper puzzles so doubt I will meet the 15 minute challenge on this one, but will certainly enjoy having a go at tackling it!  It&#8217;s strange how some variations of the japanese puzzles come more easily than others.  It&#8217;s really great to see some more adventurous puzzles though, so thanks for keeping the brain cells ticking over!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.garethmoore.co.uk/2009/04/jigsaw-gap-samurai/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garethmoore.co.uk/?p=155#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Hi Christine,

30 minutes is very impressive!  You&#039;re obviously up for a challenge on your Samurai Sudoku variants, so I&#039;ll keep the variations coming!  I just added a Skyscraper Samurai Jigsaw for a bit of variety, but it&#039;s probably slightly easier than this gap jigsaw puzzle so perhaps that won&#039;t provide much of a challenge? :)

If you&#039;d like another target to beat, the Skyscraper Consecutive Sudoku from yesterday (the 15th April) can be solved in about 15 minutes if you&#039;re quick.  I was very pleased how smoothly it broke - no need to write in almost any pencilmarks to get going (I think I wrote less than 10 throughout the whole puzzle!).

And finally: hello again! It&#039;s good to hear from you, and I&#039;m glad you enjoyed the puzzle! Yes, BBC MindGames published more adventurous variants than any other magazine or newspaper!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Christine,</p>
<p>30 minutes is very impressive!  You&#8217;re obviously up for a challenge on your Samurai Sudoku variants, so I&#8217;ll keep the variations coming!  I just added a Skyscraper Samurai Jigsaw for a bit of variety, but it&#8217;s probably slightly easier than this gap jigsaw puzzle so perhaps that won&#8217;t provide much of a challenge? <img src='http://www.garethmoore.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>If you&#8217;d like another target to beat, the Skyscraper Consecutive Sudoku from yesterday (the 15th April) can be solved in about 15 minutes if you&#8217;re quick.  I was very pleased how smoothly it broke &#8211; no need to write in almost any pencilmarks to get going (I think I wrote less than 10 throughout the whole puzzle!).</p>
<p>And finally: hello again! It&#8217;s good to hear from you, and I&#8217;m glad you enjoyed the puzzle! Yes, BBC MindGames published more adventurous variants than any other magazine or newspaper!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://www.garethmoore.co.uk/2009/04/jigsaw-gap-samurai/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 19:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garethmoore.co.uk/?p=155#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Well then I am feeling very pleased with myself for once, as I managed to solve this one in 30 minutes!  I did spend a few minutes first though colouring in all the regions as you suggested which certainly helped when cross-referencing digits!  I don&#039;t think it would have been so quick if I hadn&#039;t had so much practice at doing sudoku star puzzles and toroidal puzzles.  Once You get into the swing of looking for the blocks of three repeated numbers, the gaps fill in much quicker.

I really enjoyed this puzzle = took me back to the days of the Mind Games magazine!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well then I am feeling very pleased with myself for once, as I managed to solve this one in 30 minutes!  I did spend a few minutes first though colouring in all the regions as you suggested which certainly helped when cross-referencing digits!  I don&#8217;t think it would have been so quick if I hadn&#8217;t had so much practice at doing sudoku star puzzles and toroidal puzzles.  Once You get into the swing of looking for the blocks of three repeated numbers, the gaps fill in much quicker.</p>
<p>I really enjoyed this puzzle = took me back to the days of the Mind Games magazine!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.garethmoore.co.uk/2009/04/jigsaw-gap-samurai/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garethmoore.co.uk/?p=155#comment-6</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not surprised it took at least an hour - if anyone manages to solve it faster than that I will be very impressed!

Fascinating observation about the unmarked 3x3 boxes that result between the other 3x3 regions - this had me confused for a little while (I&#039;d managed not to notice it!), but then I realised it was because of the pattern of alternating complete 3x3 boxes combined with the full columns/rows of 9 squares (a new column/row of 9 every 3 squares).  It works out this way for the same reason that you repeat exactly the same triplet of numbers every 3 boxes in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.puzzlemix.com/showpuzzle.php?pz=Samurai%20Star&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Samurai Star&lt;/a&gt; (Flower Samurai) Sudoku puzzles.

Of course I guess if a solver managed to work out this result before getting going, they&#039;d have a few extra hints to help speed them up! :)  It certainly helps me a lot on Samurai Star puzzles, that&#039;s for sure! (avoids having to place a set of pencilmarks to reach the same conclusion)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not surprised it took at least an hour &#8211; if anyone manages to solve it faster than that I will be very impressed!</p>
<p>Fascinating observation about the unmarked 3&#215;3 boxes that result between the other 3&#215;3 regions &#8211; this had me confused for a little while (I&#8217;d managed not to notice it!), but then I realised it was because of the pattern of alternating complete 3&#215;3 boxes combined with the full columns/rows of 9 squares (a new column/row of 9 every 3 squares).  It works out this way for the same reason that you repeat exactly the same triplet of numbers every 3 boxes in <a href="http://www.puzzlemix.com/showpuzzle.php?pz=Samurai%20Star" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Samurai Star</a> (Flower Samurai) Sudoku puzzles.</p>
<p>Of course I guess if a solver managed to work out this result before getting going, they&#8217;d have a few extra hints to help speed them up! <img src='http://www.garethmoore.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   It certainly helps me a lot on Samurai Star puzzles, that&#8217;s for sure! (avoids having to place a set of pencilmarks to reach the same conclusion)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.garethmoore.co.uk/2009/04/jigsaw-gap-samurai/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 00:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.garethmoore.co.uk/?p=155#comment-4</guid>
		<description>I really enjoyed this puzzle.  I didn&#039;t time exactly how long it took me to solve, but I know it was longer than an hour (I did it at midnight).  I think it&#039;s interesting that the 3x3 regions that contain the jigsaw pieces end up containing 1 through 9 as well.  I might be more fun (and more difficult) to solve if you cut up all those 3x3 sections into more jigsaw sections.  Thanks for the puzzles!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really enjoyed this puzzle.  I didn&#8217;t time exactly how long it took me to solve, but I know it was longer than an hour (I did it at midnight).  I think it&#8217;s interesting that the 3&#215;3 regions that contain the jigsaw pieces end up containing 1 through 9 as well.  I might be more fun (and more difficult) to solve if you cut up all those 3&#215;3 sections into more jigsaw sections.  Thanks for the puzzles!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
